Village Idiot
Strat-Talker
Listen to no one 

XDListen to no one![]()
Thank you very much for taking the time to write such thorough replies.Interesting and cheers! Now there is a red flag if I ever saw one. I didn't read all the details of those Strats in the original post, but I did later pick up that one had had a refret. A refret is not necessarily a big issue in itself of course, and nothing like as concerning as seeing the same serial number on two guitars (although that can apparently happen legitimately but best to be extremely cautious as @andy86 has indicated).
As the OP did use the word "original" in the initial post and since the term can be interpreted in different ways, I guess it's also worth pointing out that at least in my view, a refretted guitar is not 100% original. Whether the term "original" applies to a CBS-era guitar that was built after Leo sold his original (ish) company to CBS, or a brand new Custom Shop guitar is also something that people could take a view on.![]()
It's nice to get such a positive response from someone who has asked for advice, so thanks and good luck. Hey, that's a good enough reason for looking for a CBS-era Strat by the way (not that you ever need a reason to buy a guitar!),Thank you very much for taking the time to write such thorough replies.
Also thanks to everybody, I really appreciate all the advice. It's a bit overwhelming but appreciated XD.
I know that mine was most likely just an itch I wanted to scratch, more than a reasonable purchase. I grew up with cbs era bands and it's probably the teenager in me who went straight in that direction.
I will keep looking then and consider a different move as well.
Thanks to @andy86 for pointing out the issue with the serial number. I'm wondering what's the story behind that guitar now.
jmyers: Hats off to you! I am in the "vintage" camp. Nothing inspires me to play/practice more than plunking on a vintage Strat. I'm old and own a '73, '70 and '66 Strat's and can't put them down. Isn't that the hidden secret to more practice? Basically, the older the better, so I side with the '68. If the instrument was played, it WILL have had a refret. But can't say I'm a fan of "medium or jumbo" as I like to feel the wood without having to press hard. Whether you buy one of these, or find another in the future, I'm sure you will find your #1.Thank you very much for taking the time to write such thorough replies.
Also thanks to everybody, I really appreciate all the advice. It's a bit overwhelming but appreciated XD.
I know that mine was most likely just an itch I wanted to scratch, more than a reasonable purchase. I grew up with cbs era bands and it's probably the teenager in me who went straight in that direction.
I will keep looking then and consider a different move as well.
Thanks to @andy86 for pointing out the issue with the serial number. I'm wondering what's the story behind that guitar now.
Yes, it's the same Tele based on these images, with a different serial number. One photo taken in a warm evening light and the other under a blue sky, which obviously affects the colour hue. Just seen the chunks taken out of the body at the corners of the neck plate in your original post with the other serial number. Some story attached to this one for sure.I agree with @Gary Davies about the refretting. This may go deeper than that though. This post made me look again for a tele and look what I found:
https://www.scruffsvintageguitars.com/shopscruffvintage/1968-Sonic-Blue-Fender-Telecaster-p398572938
It looks to me the same body as the one I posted above with the serial thing. Also it says the store is the same as the strat from OP's post.
Somewhere along the line something happened here. I'd say @FrieAsABird do you know the store well? I would warn them about this and the strat, it is indeed a red flag.
View attachment 575754 View attachment 575755
Exactly! And what about the neck? There are more pictures here at the source:Yes, it's the same Tele based on these images, with a different serial number. One photo taken in a warm evening light and the other under a blue sky, which obviously affects the colour hue. Just seen the chunks taken out of the body at the corners of the neck plate in your original post with the other serial number. Some story attached to this one for sure.
I did check as you suggested and if I do agree that the store has beautiful items, I am not sure whether they actually qualify. At least in the collectors market at that asking price. Here an example:
View attachment 578685
The actual link:
www.facebook.com/Cescoscornerguitars/posts/pfbid0TrDBZJLMqxMstY1QVSNawZaYY3jph9ULZbt6p9zk2Bv9M1G7KK6Ja1R8Vu6wbDaol
A guitar described as a "gorgeous and rare 1968 Stratocaster".
View attachment 578674
He did announce some working and a few months later a 1967 Strat with the same scratches on the body shows up on the store:
View attachment 578675
If you wish to compare:
View attachment 578677
What do you think people? @Gary Davies do you think the body is the same? To me, honestly, it feels like the same body with a different neck. The fact that it came up twice over time could be that it was returned, I wouldn't be surprised.