i'm just grateful that where i live buying custom shop stratocasters is not mandatory.
i'm just grateful that where i live buying custom shop stratocasters is not mandatory.
Yeah that’s what I’ve been saying. I’ve played one CS from 97. It had a low grade flame maple neck (or at least I didn’t even notice it was flamed but looked at it online and the local store said it was ‘highly figured’ and had some mild flaming. It was a rosewood board 61-62 style. Very nice. Great guitar, felt amazingly balanced, and I couldn’t believe it was actually 8lb.I think you've missed a fairly important point here.
A lot of players deliberately smoothed the back of the necks for playability. It doesn't look like natural wear because a lot the time, it wasn't.
In my opinion, this is what the CS is going for rather than recreating natural wear patterns. Perhaps not in every case but likely a factor in many design decisions. Heck, people do it with 'new' guitars all the time.
Just my opinion.
I feel obligated lol where else will I get that custom shop mojo????? I need that magicI’m pretty sure it’s not mandatory anywhere in the world?
Anyone can custom order one at anytime, they’ll just have to wait if they can’t find one in a store ready to go. Relics sell more so that’s what dealers order mostly. And I get it, I have a ‘58 Journeyman relic and it’s great, I love the more broken in feel and look it has, I wouldn’t buy a non relic CS I don’t think, but they’re certainly available to order.It's funny since I think the best thing of a relic CS guitar is the neck... I don't care if it does not look like a real vintage neck.. they just feel phenomenal in my hands... I used to play 6 different CS, and a sanded neck feel is fantastic...
I'm not particularly keen on relic, but it is not a big concern to me... Anyway, I think there should be more NOS models in the CS catalog... It is almost impossible to get a brand new non relic CS these days...is it what market wants?
Well, this is what 59 years of use does.
View attachment 622426 View attachment 622427
I suppose that would be what relic'd is trying to mimic.
Maybe if fender used natural "Bill The Cat's Natural Cat Sweat ScalpTonic" on the scotch brite...(sorry, copyrighted material, can't show pictures)...
Not only an important cultural icon but I used to date his sister!
I 100% approve and covet that CS neck relic look.View attachment 622463
So, this is a Fender Custom Shop one... doesn't really look like many of the others here... Not like yours, but closer? What do you think? (My 2010 '57 heavy relic)
I 100% approve and covet that CS neck relic look.
Much closer I think.View attachment 622463
So, this is a Fender Custom Shop one... doesn't really look like many of the others here... Not like yours, but closer? What do you think? (My 2010 '57 heavy relic)
No, Bill The Cat.Not Mr Bill?
I’d also prefer not to have a relic CS if I get one, but have the same finish. Then I’d relic it the old fashioned way.It's funny since I think the best thing of a relic CS guitar is the neck... I don't care if it does not look like a real vintage neck.. they just feel phenomenal in my hands... I used to play 6 different CS, and a sanded neck feel is fantastic...
I'm not particularly keen on relic, but it is not a big concern to me... Anyway, I think there should be more NOS models in the CS catalog... It is almost impossible to get a brand new non relic CS these days...is it what market wants?
my point exactly.I’m pretty sure it’s not mandatory anywhere in the world?
my point exactly.
we're still complaining, though.
it would seem that there'd be an overwhelming consensus that these partially grayed-out necks are visually hideous, we would all shrug, Fender would acknowledge a mistake and all would move on.
but no. Fender persists and we keep talking about it.
i suppose this is a homage to something a player of note from some distant past did to his guitar neck? like Stradivarius or something? it doesn't make it attractive aesthetically, but provides enough of a rationale to continue making these strange necks? i'm sure it's been answered someplace, probably even in this thread, but i just don't have the patience.
sorry about chiming in with no contribution - it's just what i do. i was only pointing out that if someone tries to sell me something undesirable, ugly and very-very expensive, it would be a reason for good laugh, not for agonizing hand-wringing.
I kind of feel like; based on my own FCS necks past and present... and what I have seen, Fender does it intensionally. They for sure know how to do it right (I feel like I have two of them) and they do upon request, for road shows, NAMM, or other.Yeah exactly. Like it, don’t like it, don’t buy it. Crying about it or telling someone you don’t like it and point at it is kind of useless. Fender sells loads of these “ugly” worn neck guitars every minute of the day.
If they didn’t I’m sure they would stop doing it but I have a feeling there’s a lot more that don’t care about how it looks but how it plays/feels.