..and there is the T2 TBX , proper-looking caps on T1 and T2 (assume values are .022uF) and proper-looking Fender/CTS volume and T1 pots (assume 250K).
..and there is the T2 TBX , proper-looking caps on T1 and T2 (assume values are .022uF) and proper-looking Fender/CTS volume and T1 pots (assume 250K).
..and the apparent mis-alignment of your pickguard screw holes ?Compare the nice even narrow edge around the guard on a real Fender body.
View attachment 610980
A proper 1999 American Standard Strat model would have the Delta Tone set-up, introduced in 1997, not the TBX T2.They are just applying the "conventional wisdom" of the "N9" serial number reflecting 1999, but the headstock decal is incorrect for a 1999, so IF this is a legit neck, it's a 1990.
Here is your primary and ONLY accurate resource for an actual database
Serial Number Lookup
serialnumberlookup.fender.com
If no information is listed there (and there won't be for anything prior to 1995), then Fender can not validate the serial number.
This information is where other sites are getting their lookup data:
How can I find out when my American-made instrument was manufactured? · Customer Self-Service
fendercustomersupport.microsoftcrmportals.com
Note:
View attachment 610923
At $750, Seller is not asking for top-dollar nor advertising a pristine "museum quality" instrument. That guitar sold for $595 new with case, and appears authentic and in fair shape. I'd be more concerned with possible fret wear/finish ,which cannot be determined because there are no clear and complete pics of the fretboard.So, I'll have to convince the seller to open up the guitar.
Maybe the photographer is an elder person and/or not technically inclined. Would you not pay a call to look at the guitar?So y'all ought to be asking yourself why this is...? Ask yourself why this seller didn't provide photos that are sharp and clear and informative? Why, upon seeing the thoroughly sh!tty quality of the photos, didn't this seller make better photos ?
Or...don't.
Your call.
Me?
I'd walk.
Their camera must be at least of the same year as that Strat, possibly came with it as a Xmas bundle?Why, upon seeing the thoroughly sh!tty quality of the photos, didn't this seller make better photos ?
No need for studio lighting and skills to get better pics, those pics are HUGE RED FLAGS.Maybe the photographer is an elder person and/or not technically inclined. Would you not pay a call to look at the guitar?
I use the ad for what it is--a thumbnail. Not everyone selling a Strat is an expert Reverb store with hundreds of sales made and a 4K camera with studio lights.
True that, its a $5 Chinese guard I bought with no pickup or contol routs to mount a single bridge Filtertron which no guards can be purchased for...and the apparent mis-alignment of your pickguard screw holes ?
Not only out of focus but tiny files with incredibly low resolution, which screams pics downloaded off the net.When I wasn't making a living wiith music I was making a living as a photographer.
When I used soft focus it was usually because I was trying to obscure or conceal.
With the cameras of today one has to work pretty f*k'n hard to make an out of focus photo. It's deliberate. (This last bit is deductive speculation.)
So y'all ought to be asking yourself why this is...? Ask yourself why this seller didn't provide photos that are sharp and clear and informative? Why, upon seeing the thoroughly sh!tty quality of the photos, didn't this seller make better photos ?
Or...don't.
Your call.
Me?
I'd walk.
No. The exterior shots are the first set I received. The interior shots are ones I asked for. Not everything is a ripoff.Not only out of focus but tiny files with incredibly low resolution, which screams pics downloaded off the net.
No need for studio lighting and skills to get better pics, those pics are HUGE RED FLAGS.
Today you cannot buy a camera anywhere that takes pics that bad with that low resolution, to get pics that bad you must download pics of guitars you do not own.
Judging from comparing with my 89 and 91Strat Plus guitars, that singe screw hole is right about where it should be. No way to tell for sure tho'....Another red flag IMO.
This is the later pic and shows a single screw hole where it has been suggested that possibly an ill fitting aftermarket guard is on a legit USA Fender body. That would generally require new holes drilled, particularly where the guard is known to fit incorrectly, and here this body appears to have no extra holes or filled holes.
This does not prove anything but to me it adds one more red flag, and fails to rectify the former red flag of ill fitting guard suggested might be aftermarket.
View attachment 611021
Well right, but if the screw hole is right for a USA body, then new holes would get drilled to mount an ill fitting aftermarket guard.Judging from comparing with my 89 and 91Strat Plus guitars, that singe screw hole is right about where it should be. No way to tell for sure tho'....
Your money, do what ya want. IDGASMaybe the photographer is an elder person and/or not technically inclined. Would you not pay a call to look at the guitar?
I use the ad for what it is--a thumbnail. Not everyone selling a Strat is an expert Reverb store with hundreds of sales made and a 4K camera with studio lights.