knh555
Most Honored Senior Member
I’d get a $2500 acoustic.
I disagree 100%. No major league touring band that goes to Europe using backline gear ever uses backline guitars and always uses backline amps. one of my best amps cost $100 ( Ampeg Gemini 1) and I’ll put it up against any $2k amp.Playing a cheap guitar in a good amp is alright, playing a good guitar in a cheap amp is blasphemy.
I’m with you.A $2k guitar and a $99 amp; Until I could afford a $2k amp.
I never equated price point with output power. one of my best amps is a Greer Mini Chief and I believe it’s only 3 watts. It cost $800 and is the best small amp I’ve ever used and I own three vintage Champ/Vibrochamp amps. I can play clubs with it and it’s plenty loud enough.It all really depends on the situation. At home a cheaper amp can usually get the job done with any guitar. But out in the wild, I'll go with a nicer, more powerful amp, and something like one of my Strats. Neither has ever had to be $2000. I'm looking for a versatile amp, usually either a Tone Master of Fender tube model (think Twin or Vibrolux, both under $2k) and say an AVRI 65 Strat ($1800 tops). I'll take the difference in beer.
That choice has always been illogical to me.I use a modeler so I don’t think that my choice of a $2k guitar is valid. That aside i know that the logic choice would be a $500 guitar and a $2k amp.
That's more of a setup issue than a quality issue...I disagree 100%. No major league touring band that goes to Europe using backline gear ever uses backline guitars and always uses backline amps. one of my best amps cost $100 ( Ampeg Gemini 1) and I’ll put it up against any $2k amp.
Exactly!2k gitfiddle. You can build a really nice tube amp for around $500.
Nah, I don’t think so. these same bands all have guitar techs who can do setups at the venue. It’s because the instrument is more important than the amp in the grand scheme of a performance.That's more of a setup issue than a quality issue...